- Review: John Wick 3 (C)
Scott Sycamore - Weekend Box Office
May 17 - 19 - Crowd Reports
Avengers: Endgame - Us
Box office comparisons - Review: Justice League (C)
Craig Younkin
Movie Review
The Ring Two
By Scott Sycamore Published March 23, 2005
US Release: March 18, 2005
Directed by: Hideo Nakata
Starring: Naomi Watts , Simon Baker , David Dorfman , Emily VanCamp
PG-13
Running Time: 110 minutes
Domestic Box Office: $76,032,000
Directed by: Hideo Nakata
Starring: Naomi Watts , Simon Baker , David Dorfman , Emily VanCamp
PG-13
Running Time: 110 minutes
Domestic Box Office: $76,032,000
C
The efforts {to induce terror} are forced and comparable to an average horror movie.
I was quite impressed and entertained by the first Ring. I mean, how often does an actually good horror film come along? So I had somewhat high hopes for The Ring Two (and I like how they spell out the number for this movie). Of course, my hopes were shattered - what else is new?
Following the events of the first film, Rachel (Naomi Watts) and her son Aidan (David Dorfman) move to a coastal town for a new life. After a prologue showing that the haunted videotape still exists, the mother and son attempt to recuperate from the madness of their past. But sure enough, something intrudes: Aidan starts exhibiting sickness symptoms, and it becomes increasingly clear that Samara (the ghost girl from the first film) is involved in the madness.
But madness is something this film does not have enough of. There is in fact a segment in a mental institution, which is a cheap ploy, but the movie still doesn't push any envelopes. It thinks it is creepy, and that's the problem. The first film didn't try desperate gimmicks to create an eerie mood (and a lot of it was psychologically induced), and here the efforts are forced and comparable to an average horror movie. There are a few jumpy moments as expected, but they are expected, which takes the impact away. Hideo Nakata, the original Japanese director of Ringu, directed this picture, and yet the finished product is something that any American hack could have turned out equally well.
Naomi Watts comes off as very motherly, and that is her best quality besides her beauty. She carries the film, but she is given little material to work with. David Dorfman is weird and creepy, but he's also nearly impossible to like; a child actor who could convey more of an emotional range may have been a better choice. There are cameos from Gary Cole and Sissy Spacek (perhaps a nod to Carrie), but their characters do not mean much to the story.
The Ring Two is a sequel that proves why sequels should rarely be made. The Ring is clearly not a franchise; there's only enough material for one movie. Of course, the efforts could have been creative and fresh, and worthy of a sequel, but in today's age that's probably too much to ask. Let's hope they quietly put the series to bed instead of unleashing The Ring Three.
Following the events of the first film, Rachel (Naomi Watts) and her son Aidan (David Dorfman) move to a coastal town for a new life. After a prologue showing that the haunted videotape still exists, the mother and son attempt to recuperate from the madness of their past. But sure enough, something intrudes: Aidan starts exhibiting sickness symptoms, and it becomes increasingly clear that Samara (the ghost girl from the first film) is involved in the madness.
But madness is something this film does not have enough of. There is in fact a segment in a mental institution, which is a cheap ploy, but the movie still doesn't push any envelopes. It thinks it is creepy, and that's the problem. The first film didn't try desperate gimmicks to create an eerie mood (and a lot of it was psychologically induced), and here the efforts are forced and comparable to an average horror movie. There are a few jumpy moments as expected, but they are expected, which takes the impact away. Hideo Nakata, the original Japanese director of Ringu, directed this picture, and yet the finished product is something that any American hack could have turned out equally well.
Naomi Watts comes off as very motherly, and that is her best quality besides her beauty. She carries the film, but she is given little material to work with. David Dorfman is weird and creepy, but he's also nearly impossible to like; a child actor who could convey more of an emotional range may have been a better choice. There are cameos from Gary Cole and Sissy Spacek (perhaps a nod to Carrie), but their characters do not mean much to the story.
The Ring Two is a sequel that proves why sequels should rarely be made. The Ring is clearly not a franchise; there's only enough material for one movie. Of course, the efforts could have been creative and fresh, and worthy of a sequel, but in today's age that's probably too much to ask. Let's hope they quietly put the series to bed instead of unleashing The Ring Three.
Scott's Grade: C
Scott's Overall Grading: 417 graded movies
A | 15.1% | |
B | 59.2% | |
C | 24.5% | |
D | 1.2% | |
F | 0.0% |
'The Ring 2' Articles
- Lee's review C+
March 19, 2005 The pieces are so straightforward {and so} there isn?t much of a mystery to figure out. -- Lee Tistaert - Friday Box Office Analysis (3/18)
March 19, 2005 Scream 2 opened in December of 1997 to $12.3 million, but averaged an equivalent $4,621 per-screen. -- Lee Tistaert - Craig's review C+
March 18, 2005 Does a nice job of capturing our interest, but then chooses to take us to a sillier and less satisfying place. -- Craig Younkin - Weekend Outlook Chat (March 18 - 20)
March 18, 2005 If The Sixth Sense and White Noise can average up to $12,000 in 2200 theaters, I'm having a hard time believing Ring?s not going to do a little more in 3300. -- Staff of LMI